Should wrestlers win/lost record have any effect on their legacy? - win the lost at any cost-song lyrics
It is more than anything else on the turbulence and enough about Goldberg.
Now I understand a number of invincibility is a good way to stop anything to create the heel, Umaga and The Great Khali, for example, but not something that will be remembered. If Goldberg is a question asked here, I can almost guarantee that someone say something about it is great is because he had so long unbeaten. Many fighters have had one of these lines, André the Giant had lost one of 15 (to the outside and even if DQ) and The Undertaker was his first year without losing the WWE.
The question is, in a particular program, the thing that really counts, something impressive is? Is there a plausible reason for a winning streak is really something? Please explain your answers.
BQ: What do people think of my beautiful new avatar? You do not have a curiosity lol reply
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Win The Lost At Any Cost-song Lyrics Should Wrestlers Win/lost Record Have Any Effect On Their Legacy?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Profit / loss in my opinion, should be a factor. I understand that you're coming. Vladimir Kozlov is far from being a legend, but I do not even know before been provided.
But in about 15 years, gain or loss is to be a factor. ) People like Triple H and Undertaker (the legends have lost very few times over the past 5 years. It takes a legend (even if the pre-determined) can be programmed to many victories.
Win means a lot more successful exploit could.
Absolutely not - is a stroke "in Lucha Libre means nothing.
Simply because, as you said - is a minus sign.
Wow, Goldberg has won 150 games in a row or something - Who Cares? - It was not real.
That was the story of the building.
It has served its purpose, it is the job - made him
Stories "Stripes" are a little more and fishing - not something special.
BQ - Okay, but what is it?
Yes and no
No, Khali and Umaga Dint get a lot of mainstream popularity when he was a consecutive defeat in the first chapter of Sun Dint Taker
Yes, The Undertaker and Goldberg, who became popular mainly due to successive Taker from now .... Luk At first people Goldberg calls him back to the WWE
Yes and no
No, Khali and Umaga Dint get a lot of mainstream popularity when he was a consecutive defeat in the first chapter of Sun Dint Taker
Yes, The Undertaker and Goldberg, who became popular mainly due to successive Taker from now .... Luk At first people Goldberg calls him back to the WWE
Brock Lesnar was in the Guinness Book of Records as the youngest champion of the WWE (or maybe it was featured youngest World Champion Heritage?). Normally, the Guinness Book is all taken on the actual achievements, but Lesnar has, but is a WWE script!
I do not know that the blood of cattle pro wrestler / Lost Records. The resulting lost record really means nothing at all is a record unbeaten Undertaker (16 - 0).
lol lol not even look at the records of the Sandman
Not at all.
win .. "Victory is mine"
BQ: sux
Post a Comment